During my first depressive episode I ran smack into Christianity's biggest theological dilemma -- the problem of evil. Why was God letting this happen to me? I couldn't see any possible purpose to suffering of such magnitude, especially at the tender age of 15.
Everyone collides with the reality of suffering eventually. Some face it much earlier than I did -- children who lose parents or experience abuse at a young age may never remember a time when it wasn't part of their understanding of the world. For most of us, however, it's a loss of innocence that accompanies suffering, either directly experienced or indirectly observed, that radically shifts our perspective on the human condition.
In theological jargon the answer to the problem of evil is called a "theodicy". The problem theodicies address is the seeming inconsistency of the existence of both evil in the world and a supposedly all-powerful, all-knowing, and entirely benevolent God. In Old Testament terms, it's not so much the question of why Eve ate the apple, as why God let her.
Responses from the world's traditions run the gamut from "people bring evil on themselves" (think Pat Robertson's claim that the people of Haiti brought on an earthquake by turning away from God), to "there are two opposing forces of good and evil" (think Star Wars theology--loosely rooted in the dualism of ancient religions like Persia's Zoroastrianism and an early Christian heretical branch, Gnosticism).
I grew up a mainline Methodist. I don't remember the Church promoting any one canonical explanation of evil -- since theologians can't figure it out I don't think the Church expected us to. But the question arose, as it always does, when members suffered pain and loss. One common explanation I heard growing up was that our limited perception prevents us from understanding God's purpose for our suffering (I'll call this the "mystery" approach).
(Theodicy is less a problem for eastern religions. As I understand it, Buddhism denies a personal God, reasoning that suffering comes from attachment.
Here's a website that provides a short summary of the theodicies of several Christian traditions that is worth looking at if you want to explore comparative theodicies further: Explanation of Christian/Jewish theodicies.)
Each theodicy has its shortcomings. The dualistic "Star Wars" theodicy denies the omnipotence and singularity of God (after all, it supposes an equally powerful co-existent evil force in the world); the Pat Robertson theology denies God's total benevolence; and the mainline Protestant approach seems to punt the intellectual problem into the realm of "mystery" instead of pursuing a comprehensible answer.
Another reconciliation of God with evil is presented by Rabbi Harold Kushner in his best-seller "Why Bad Things Happen to Good People," a book he wrote in response to his son's death at age 14 from Progeria, a rare disease that causes premature aging. Kushner reasons that God is all-knowing and all-loving, but not all powerful. He can sit with us in our suffering, but cannot prevent it. Again, this approach denies a fundamental trait of God.
So why do we suffer? Can suffering and evil be reconciled with the divine attributes of God? I've never found a satisfactory answer. True, I may just be unable to see it, maybe "everything happens for a reason," but it's hard to believe that my spiritual vision is that bad.
I have a hard time imagining why God would allow someone to experience what, in my case, I can only characterize as unadulterated suffering. When I see what others endure I'm just as perplexed. Why does God allow a person to become homeless? Why does God allow anger, bitterness, misunderstanding? Why does God allow murder, war, and rape?
I don't know. For a long time the contradiction made me sympathetic to agnosticism and atheism--perhaps the most humane responses to the problem of evil because they fully acknowledge a sufferer's pain and the feeling of meaninglessness that so often accompanies it. They acknowledge this complexity by admitting that it makes no sense.
I'm not sure that there is a good answer. For me, suffering hasn't made me more faithful in a traditional Western sense, but I've become open to eastern interpretations of the divine, or less traditional western explanations of God's presence. What I find interesting is that some people become do more faithful in their suffering -- a testament to how individual and unique each person's experience with the same disease can be.
Recent Comments